Research ethics

Code of Ethics 7th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (IPRIA2025)

Authors’ Duties:

Reporting Standards

Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Related data should be represented accurately in the paper. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality, Plagiarism and Concurrent Publication

Authors should submit only original works, and should appropriately cite or quote the work and/or words of others. Plagiarism is totally inacceptable and will determine the immediate rejection of the paper. Submitting the same paper to more than one conference constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author ensures that all contributing co-authors and no uninvolved persons are included in the author list. The corresponding author will also verify that all co-authors have approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should include a statement disclosing any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their submission. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the publisher and to cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper in the form of an erratum.

All authors and participants are required to adhere to the highest standards of research ethics. In the event that any misconduct—such as plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate submission, or unauthorized use of others’ work—is proven, the paper will be removed from the conference proceedings, the author’s name will be placed on the blacklist, and no fees will be refunded.

Regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence tools in scientific writing, authors must maintain transparency and integrity by explicitly declaring the extent and manner of AI tools’ usage (e.g., ChatGPT or similar systems) within their manuscripts. Any unacknowledged or misleading use of AI tools will be considered a violation of research ethics.

For further guidance on the ethical use of AI in scientific research, please refer to:

• The Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Research: New Guidance Needed for a New Tool (ResearchGate)

• PMC: The Ethics of Using AI in Scientific Research

For a complete review on the Code of Ethics of the conference visit the following link: 
https://www.ieee.org.ir/plagiarism-awareness/